Skip to content

Most Recent Blog Posts

Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” Cities in Canada

Steinbach, Manitoba ranks #1 as Bible Gateway’s most “Bible-minded” city in Canada for 2013.

In our previous post, we assembled usage data from 2013 of visitors to BibleGateway.com that indicate Bible Gateway’s popularity in U.S. cities while also controlling for population. By popular demand, we’ve now done the same thing with visitor data from Canadian cities and compiled a list of the top 50 cities. Remember, our data show overall usage regardless of how the reader (visitor) feels about the Bible’s accuracy.

[UPDATE: Read our summary post What Does it Mean to be “Bible-minded”?]

Top 50 Canada Cities on Bible Gateway in 2013

The colors indicate usage: dark blue are those cities where Bible Gateway is most popular, light blue are next, then light red, then dark red. The larger the size of the dot, the more relative pageviews occurred from that location on Bible Gateway. We’ve detailed British Columbia and Ontario in the maps below for easier viewing.

Top British Columbia Cities on Bible Gateway in 2013

Top Ontario Cities on Bible Gateway in 2013

Here’s the complete list:

Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” Cities in Canada

  1. Steinbach, MB
  2. Winkler, MB
  3. Langley, BC
  4. Fredericton, NB
  5. Victoria, BC
  6. Moncton, NB
  7. Abbotsford, BC
  8. Saint John, NB
  9. Waterloo, ON
  10. Grande Prairie, AB
  11. Red Deer, AB
  12. Kelowna, BC
  13. Vancouver, BC
  14. Lethbridge, AB
  15. Saskatoon, SK
  16. Richmond, BC
  17. Toronto, ON
  18. Edmonton, AB
  19. Calgary, AB
  20. Richmond Hill, ON
  21. Winnipeg, MB
  22. Chilliwack, BC
  23. Prince George, BC
  24. Surrey, BC
  25. Regina, SK
  26. London, ON
  27. Kitchener, ON
  28. Barrie, ON
  29. Kingston, ON
  30. St. Catharines, ON
  31. Guelph, ON
  32. Burnaby, BC
  33. Coquitlam, BC
  34. Brantford, ON
  35. Markham, ON
  36. Brampton, ON
  37. St. John’s, NL
  38. Windsor, ON
  39. Oshawa, ON
  40. Oakville, ON
  41. Hamilton, ON
  42. Ajax, ON
  43. Peterborough, ON
  44. Mississauga, ON
  45. Ottawa, ON
  46. Greater Sudbury, ON
  47. Burlington, ON
  48. Halifax, NS
  49. Vaughan, ON
  50. Montreal, QC

We have several Canadian bloggers as members of the Bible Gateway Blogger Grid. You may also be interested in reading our blogpost, 2013 Year in Review on Bible Gateway.

What Are Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” USA Cities?

In our previous post, we mused about what Bible Gateway’s statistics would reveal about the most “Bible-minded” cities in the U.S. Crunching the numbers from 2013, we came up with the following charts that indicate Bible Gateway’s popularity in U.S. cities (also see Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” Cities in Canada and Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” Cities in the UK and Australia) while also controlling for population (so more-populous cities don’t dominate the top spots). The charts show some differences between the ABS/Barna data and our own. However, note that we’re measuring different things: the ABS/Barna survey is measuring Bible reading and agreement that the Bible is accurate, while our data show overall usage regardless of how the reader feels about the Bible’s accuracy.

[UPDATE: Read our summary post What Does it Mean to be “Bible-minded”?]

Top 100 Cities on Bible Gateway in 2013
The colors indicate quartiles: the top 25 cities where Bible Gateway is most popular on a per-household basis are dark blue, the next 25 are light blue, the next 25 are light red, and the bottom 25 are dark red. The size of the dot indicates how many relative pageviews per household occurred on Bible Gateway–the cities with the highest usage of Bible Gateway have about five times more pageviews per household than the cities with the lowest usage.

Here’s the complete list of the same 100 cities in the ABS/Barna survey. Many of the changes are quite striking, especially near the top of the list; Washington, D.C., for example, jumps up 77 places, while Atlanta takes the top spot.

City Bible Gateway Rank ABS/Barna Rank Difference in Rank
Atlanta, GA 1 29 +28
Dallas / Fort Worth, TX 2 22 +20
Washington, DC / Hagerstown, MD 3 80 +77
Charlotte, NC 4 6 +2
Nashville, TN 5 13 +8
Raleigh / Durham / Fayetteville, NC 6 27 +21
Waco / Temple / Bryan, TX 7 43 +36
Chattanooga, TN 8 1 -7
San Antonio, TX 9 34 +25
Houston, TX 10 41 +31
Norfolk / Portsmouth / Newport News, VA 11 31 +20
Austin, TX 12 48 +36
Honolulu, HI 13 78 +65
Huntsville / Decatur, AL 14 12 -2
Birmingham / Anniston / Tuscaloosa, AL 15 2 -13
Colorado Springs-Pueblo CO 16 56 +40
Columbia, SC 17 24 +7
Roanoke / Lynchburg, VA 18 3 -15
Tulsa, OK 19 32 +13
Orlando / Daytona Beach / Melbourne, FL 20 65 +45
Springfield, MO 21 4 -17
Kansas City, KS-MO 22 42 +20
San Diego, CA 23 72 +49
Grand Rapids / Kalamazoo / Battle Creek, MI 24 30 +6
Greenville / Spartanburg / Anderson, SC / Asheville, NC 25 8 -17
Los Angeles, CA 26 73 +47
Indianapolis, IN 27 28 +1
Columbus, OH 28 47 +19
Jackson, MS 29 9 -20
Jacksonville, FL 30 18 -12
South Bend / Elkhart, IN 31 39 +8
Greensboro / High Point / Winston-Salem, NC 32 20 -12
Memphis, TN 33 26 -7
Chicago, IL 34 74 +40
Wichita / Huthinson, KS 35 15 -20
Seattle / Tacoma, WA 36 71 +35
Lexington, KY 37 14 -23
Oklahoma City, OK 38 16 -22
Baltimore, MD 39 68 +29
Knoxville, TN 40 10 -30
West Palm Beach / Fort Pierce, FL 41 59 +18
Charleston, SC 42 38 -4
Little Rock / Pine Bluff, AR 43 8 -35
San Francisco / Oakland / San Jose, CA 44 97 +53
Dayton, OH 45 37 -8
Richmond / Petersburg, VA 46 36 -10
Miami / Ft. Lauderdale, FL 47 64 +17
Harrisburg / Lancaster / Lebanon / York, PA 48 69 +21
Mobile, AL / Pensacola / Ft. Walton, FL 49 23 -26
Omaha, NE 50 55 +5
Louisville, KY 51 17 -34
Greenville / New Bern / Washington, NC 52 33 -19
Minneapolis / St. Paul, MN 53 75 +22
Detroit, MI 54 49 -5
Portland, OR 55 61 +6
Madison, WI 56 79 +23
Baton Rouge, LA 57 25 -32
Shreveport, LA 58 5 -53
Phoenix / Prescott, AZ 59 93 +34
St. Louis, MO 60 58 -2
Denver, CO 61 81 +20
Des Moines / Ames, IA 62 53 -9
Tampa / St. Petersburg / Sarasota, FL 63 63 +0
Cincinnati, OH 64 45 -19
Philadelphia, PA 65 57 -8
Spokane, WA 66 54 -12
Bakersfield, CA 67 21 -46
Sacramento / Stockton / Modesto, CA 68 66 -2
Champaign / Springfield / Decatur, IL 69 60 -9
Cleveland / Akron / Canton, OH 70 50 -20
Toledo, OH 71 88 +17
Charleston / Huntington, WV 72 11 -61
New Orleans, LA 73 35 -38
New York, NY 74 89 +15
Milwaukee, WI 75 76 +1
Paducah, KY / Cape Girardeau, MO / Harrisburg, IL / Mt Vernon, IL 76 19 -57
Tucson / Sierra Vista, AZ 77 82 +5
Cedar Rapids / Waterloo, IA 78 96 +18
Fresno / Visalia, CA 79 70 -9
Flint / Saginaw / Bay City, MI 80 52 -28
Harlingen / Weslaco / Brownsville / McAllen, TX 81 46 -35
Boston, MA / Manchester, NH 82 98 +16
Rochester, NY 83 83 +0
Johnstown / Altoona, PA 84 40 -44
Albuquerque / Santa Fe, NM 85 51 -34
Pittsburgh, PA 86 67 -19
Ft. Myers / Naples, FL 87 77 -10
El Paso, TX / Las Cruces, NM 88 62 -26
Davenport, IA / Rock Island / Moline, IL 89 44 -45
Hartford / New Haven, CT 90 94 +4
Green Bay / Appleton, WI 91 85 -6
Syracuse, NY 92 86 -6
Wilkes-Barre / Scranton, PA 93 84 -9
Las Vegas, NV 94 90 -4
Portland / Auburn, ME 95 91 -4
Buffalo, NY 96 95 -1
Albany / Schenectady / Troy, NY 97 99 +2
Providence, RI / New Bedford, MA 98 100 +2
Burlington, VT / Plattsburgh, NY 99 92 -7
Salt Lake City, UT 100 87 -13

What Are America’s Most Bible-Minded Cities?

americas-most-bible-minded-cities-infographic-2014-american-bible-society What’s the most “Bible-minded” city in the United States? Though it ranks 87th in population size, Chattanooga, TN, ranks number one in “Bible-mindedness” among US cities, according to a recent survey by the American Bible Society (ABS) and Barna Group.

Chattanooga takes over the number-one ranking from Knoxville, TN, which claimed the top spot in 2012. (For the purposes of the study, “Bible-mindedness” was calculated based on combined levels of regular Bible reading and residents’ belief in the Bible’s accuracy.)

Here are the ten most and least Bible-minded cities, based on the survey (click on the image above to see the full list):

Most Bible-Minded Cities in the U.S.

  1. Chattanooga, TN
  2. Birmingham, AL
  3. Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
  4. Springfield, MO
  5. Shreveport, LA
  6. Charlotte, NC
  7. Greenville/Spartanburg, SC/Asheville, NC.
  8. Little Rock, AR
  9. Jackson, MS
  10. Knoxville, TN

Least Bible-Minded Cities in the U.S.

  1. Providence, RI/ New Bedford, MA
  2. Albany, NY
  3. Boston, MA
  4. San Francisco, CA
  5. Cedar Rapids, IA
  6. Buffalo, NY
  7. Hartford/New Haven, CT
  8. Phoenix, AZ
  9. Burlington, VT
  10. Portland, ME

You can read a thorough breakdown of the results (and find out more about how the survey was conducted) at the ABS website. The findings suggest an inverse relationship between population density and Bible friendliness. Of the top 25 Bible-minded cities, only three have a population of greater than 1 million households: Charlotte; Nashville, TN; and Dallas, TX. Only one of the top 10 (Charlotte) ranks in the top 25 cities by population size.

We thought it would be interesting to do a quick comparison of these findings with our own data about the cities that most frequently read the Bible online at Bible Gateway. Here’s what we found:

U.S. Cities that most frequently visit BibleGateway.com

  1. New York, NY
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Houston, TX
  4. Chicago, IL
  5. Dallas, TX
  6. Atlanta, GA
  7. San Antonio, TX
  8. Washington, DC
  9. San Francisco, CA
  10. Charlotte, NC

The above list is much simpler than ABS’ study, so we shouldn’t read too much into it—it’s just a measure of the total number of visits to Bible Gateway, and unlike the ABS survey it doesn’t delve into the details of how and why people in those cities are reading the Bible online. But among other things, it does suggest that we shouldn’t write off America’s largest cities, or the entire U.S. East Coast, quite yet!

For a more detailed exploration of our own data, see our blogpost What Are Bible Gateway’s Most “Bible-Minded” Cities?.

Christianity Today did another analysis of the survey and suggests one theory as to why certain cities “embrace the Bible” more than others: 19 of the top 20 most “Bible-minded” cities host sizable Christian colleges. Read further coverage in CT’s article, More Bible Stats: Top 100 Searching Cities Look Very Different from Top 100 Believing Cities.

How do the results of the ABS survey strike you—any surprises? How might you explain the apparent differences between ABS’ survey results and Bible Gateway’s list? Stop by our page on Facebook to share your thoughts.

New Videos: Did a Historical Adam Really Exist?

adamLast month, with the help of our friends at Zondervan Academic, we posted a series of different perspectives on the question of biblical inerrancy. Today, we turn to another topic that relates to the discussion about biblical interpretation: the question of the “historical Adam.”

The question of whether Adam and Eve actually existed—as real people who lived in real history and who are the parents of all humanity—has become a touchy question within evangelical Christian theology.

Some scholars insist that a historical Adam is necessary; after all, the apostle Paul contrasts Adam and Jesus and seems to view Adam as equally historical, and many Christian doctrines have traditionally hinged on Adam. Other scholars doubt both the existence of a man named Adam and his necessity to our faith.

4 Views on the Historical AdamUnderlying the disagreement about Adam are questions about evolution and the inerrancy of Scripture, the kind of issues by which institutions define themselves and over which professors can lose jobs.

To give you a taste of the different views and what’s at stake in this debate, we’ve collected new videos from contributors and editors of the new Zondervan book, Four Views on the Historical Adam.

A Young-Earth View on the Historical Adam
(With Contributor William D. Barrick)

The Historical Adam as “Archetypal Figure”
(With Contributor John Walton)

The Historical Adam Debate
(With General Editor Matthew Barrett)

Why is the Historical Adam Debate Essential?
(With General Editor Ardel Caneday)

Unfortunately we could not obtain videos with contributors Denis O. Lamoreux and C. John Collins, but you will find some of their major points summarized below.

 

What are the Four Views on the Historical Adam?

Here are key points from all four of the book’s contributors, taken from their “Four Views on the Historical Adam” talks at the latest meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. To learn more about the essential debate over the historical Adam, check out the new book from Zondervan, Four Views on the Historical Adam. -Zondervan Academic (@ZonderAcademic)

1. No Historical Adam: Evolutionary Creation View — Denis Lamoureux

  • Since Scripture is true and science at its best is true, it may be reasonable to assume that the Bible and science should align—but they don’t. “Scientific concordism,” which has been a default position among many evangelicals, is not itself taught by Scripture.
  • What we find in Scripture, instead, are examples of ancient perspectives on taxonomy and human history. “Adam” was the best of ancient science, but he never existed.
  • The ancient science in Scripture shouldn’t harm our trust in Scripture, because God was simply accommodating his word to the original readers. The science is incidental, but the spiritual truths are inerrant.
  • Evolution is teleological, meaning guided by God, and it was the process by which he guided the creation that he continues to sustain and oversee.

2. A Historical Adam: Archetypal Creation View — John Walton

  • Although most scholars have traditionally viewed the creation of Adam and Eve in Genesis 2 as a fuller explanation of God’s creation of man and woman on Day 6 in Genesis 1, Walton questions that understanding.
  • Genesis 2 is a “sequel” to Genesis 1. Walton outlined the use of “sequels” as a literary feature throughout Genesis.
  • Genesis 2 is not focused on the material creation of humans. It is focused on God’s purpose for humans. Adam and Eve were real people, archetypes of the human race, but they may not have been the very first people or the parents of all humanity.
  • Scripture doesn’t include an account of the biological or material creation of humanity. Since the Bible doesn’t make claims along these lines, Christians are free to consider various methods for the creation of humans including evolution.

3. A Historical Adam: Old-Earth Creation View — John Collins

  • “Historical” does not equal “literal.” Nor does it mean “prose,” “complete in detail,” “free from ideological bias,” “told in exact chronological sequence,” etc. Collins stressed that the Genesis creation accounts are intended to be history, but that biblical history needn’t match modern understandings of history.
  • In response to the assertion that the Bible and other ancient near eastern literature creates history out of mythology, Collins quoted K. A. Kitchen: The ancient near east did not historicize myth… there was, rather, a trend to ‘mythologize’ history.” In other words, ancient near eastern people did not turn myths into history. Instead, some people added mythic aspects to real history.
  • According to Collins, history matters because biblical faith is based on a narrative of God’s creating and redeeming work; it is not based merely on assent to timeless spiritual truths. Thus, the historical existence of Adam is essential to the Christian story and our faith.

4. A Historical Adam: Young Earth Creation View — William Barrick

  • Barrick’s underlying assumptions: the universe is not billions of years old (though he holds to an earth that’s older than 7,000 years), God is the ultimate author of Genesis, Scripture is independently accurate (thus it doesn’t need outside verification), Scripture should be interpreted the same way all throughout it, Genesis 1-11 is universal in scope, and both the Old Testament and New Testament assume a common and historical human origin stemming from Adam.
  • The contrasting assumptions Barrick rejects: evolutionary science, an old earth, the view that biblical authors held a pre-scientific perspective (he believes that ancient Hebrew believers did not hold to a solid firmament in the sky, a 3-storey universe, etc.)
  • His conclusion: If you read the text straightforwardly, not reading between the lines, a historical Adam created directly by God is what you find.

Learn more about these views in the new Zondervan book Four Views on the Historical Adam.

The Bible Gateway App Gets a New Look for iOS 7

The Bible Gateway app has gotten a complete visual makeover! We’ve updated the app to correspond with the look and feel of iOS 7.

The updated app has a slimmer, cleaner, and more intuitive design that fits in visually with your other iOS 7 apps, and optimizes the experience of reading and studying the Bible. The updated app features a more user-friendly design; among other things, we’ve eliminated several visual elements that were proving distracting for users. Here’s a sample of what you’ll find when you open up the updated app (click to enlarge):

screenshot1screenshot2

This is a major visual update, and we understand that this change may take a little while to get used to. But we’re very excited about the app’s new look, and we’re confident that you’ll love it as much as we do. Please note that though the app’s appearance has changed, its functionality has not—all of the app’s content and features remain unchanged.

We encourage you to take a look and try out the new design! If you already have the app installed on your iOS 7 device, you will be (or already have been) prompted to update to the newest version. If you don’t yet have the app, you can get it free here. The latest visual update only applies to iOS 7 users, although the app is available for Android, Kindle Fire, and earlier versions of iOS.

Update: Here’s what some of our fans on Twitter have been saying about the app’s new look:

The Bible and Martin Luther King, Jr.

MLKJToday is Martin Luther king, Jr. Day in the U.S.—a holiday dedicated to the memory of the influential civil rights activist and preacher. Because King understood the struggle for civil rights to be a spiritual as well as political crusade, his speeches and writings often drew heavily on the Bible.

How familiar are you with the Scriptural basis for King’s message? Here are several posts we’ve published here on the blog over the last few years exploring those Bible references:

Where Do You Read the Bible? Bible Gateway Visitors Share Their Answers

In a recent online poll, we asked visitors to the Bible Gateway blog where they most often read the Bible. Thousands of readers responded; here’s what they shared.

A full 30% of poll respondents say they read their Bible most often in a study room in their home. Not far behind are those who say they read “everywhere” because they use a mobile Bible app (19%).

The next most common location for Bible reading is in bed before drifting off to sleep (19%), followed by church (6%), the dinner table (5%), at the office (5%), in a Bible study group (3%), and during their commute to work (1%). Twelve percent say they read the Bible most often in other locations.

The relatively high number of people who take the Bible with them everywhere via a mobile app fits with the results of our previous poll, in which six out of every ten people said mobile device Bible apps (like the Bible Gateway App) have caused them to read the Bible more than they did before they downloaded the apps.

Wherever you do your Bible reading, we encourage you to read the Bible daily. Our email, mobile, and online reading plans, newsletters, and devotionals make engagement with Scripture as convenient as possible for you.

Our next Bible Gateway poll asks: Does a digital Bible on a mobile device have the same significance as a print Bible in political and judicial swearing-in ceremonies? Share your answer below:

Does a digital Bible on a mobile device have the same significance as a print Bible in political and judicial swearing-in ceremonies?

  • No, only a print Bible is acceptable (61%, 3,078 Votes)
  • Yes, either digital or print is acceptable (23%, 1,170 Votes)
  • Yes, but the Bible text must be showing on the screen or it doesn't count (9%, 468 Votes)
  • Neither--a Bible is not necessary for such ceremonies (9%, 463 Votes)
  • Yes--in fact, a digital Bible should be the preferred method (5%, 235 Votes)

Total Voters: 5,063

Loading ... Loading ...

Three Reasons That Bible Reading is Down in an Age of Easy Bible Access

Peter Enns has an interesting post up identifying the three biggest reasons that people aren’t reading the Bible as much in churches, based on information he learned at a recent conference. Here’s an abbreviated list of the three reasons he describes:

Bible reading is down because people read it…

In fragments, meaning in the verse level rather than in large sections.

A-historically, meaning without a feel for the historical context of the texts being read.

In isolation, meaning individual “devotions” rather than in groups.

Read his full post for more context and discussion of this list.

What do you think of these reasons—do they hit home when you think about Bible reading in your church and personal life?

One reason Enns’ list caught my attention is that all of the reasons he identifies are trends that are enabled—or at very least not countered—by the tools of the digital era. The digital era has made it easier than ever for people to access the Bible in the place, format, and timeframe of their choice. We can pull up exactly the Bible verse we want and in total privacy. And those are without a doubt good things.

But I think we can appreciate the incredible value of this level of access to the Bible and still be aware of the possible drawbacks. Our web browsers, mobile apps, and email programs make it easy to skip some of the harder, less fun, but nonetheless important elements of the Bible experience: reading it in community with fallible fellow believers… taking the time to explore challenging and sometimes confusing parts of Scripture in order to better understand God’s Word as a whole… interacting regularly with others about what we read, and how it’s transforming us.

These are important issues for citizens of the digital Christian world—including us at Bible Gateway and our peers—to consider, and we do keep them in mind. (When Bible Gateway’s general manager Rachel Barach spoke about discipleship in the digital age at last year’s Christian New Media Conference, she challenged the audience to wrestle with these ideas.)

But these are also things that each of us, as individual Bible readers who turn to God’s Word in our web browsers and mobile devices, should consider. The benefits of digital Bible access are undeniable. But do the digital tools we use to access Scripture shape our Bible reading in other ways? Do our tools sometimes isolate our reading from the church community, or make it too easy to read just the parts of Scripture that we want to read? What attitudes and behaviors can we practice to make sure that we’re reading the Bible as much, and as completely, as we can?

Bible Summary: See the Big Picture of the Bible

In 2010, Chris Juby began tweeting summaries of every chapter in the Bible. We’re excited to announce that we’ve partnered with him to retweet his entire Bible Summary project at @biblegateway, and to share some of his insights on the experience here at the Bible Gateway blog. This guest post by Chris is the first such essay.

The first time I read the Bible cover-to-cover I was amazed by what I found. I was also amazed by what I thought I would find but didn’t.

The experience had such a big impact on me that I made reading cover-to-cover my regular habit. At one chapter per day it takes three years and three months to read the whole Bible. That’s a pretty major undertaking, but it’s absolutely worth it!

When I started for the fourth time in August 2010, I took on an extra challenge to help keep me focused. I decided to write summaries of each chapter and post them to Twitter.

The @biblesummary account proved to be quite a hit. I was interviewed about it for newspapers, radio and television, and by the time I finished in November 2013 I had 30,000 followers. I’m now partnering with Bible Gateway to retweet the whole project.

I’ll be sharing some of the experiences I had and the lessons I learned over the years here at the Bible Gateway blog. But as the journey begins again, let me encourage you with probably the main benefit of reading the whole Bible:

You see the big picture.

Everyone has their favourite verses and passages, but there’s an overall story that’s more important than any of the individual parts. All the narratives and prophecies and promises and wisdom of Scripture come together in an incredible vision of God’s eternal purpose in Christ. (Read Ephesians 1 for more of a glimpse!)

That’s what made such a huge impact on my faith. And the Bible itself gives some clues as to why that might be:

When Jesus teaches the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, he says, “Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.” (Luke 24:44) So every part of Scripture helps us to know and understand Christ.

Later, Paul tells Timothy, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:17-17) So every part of Scripture helps us to live effectively as followers of Christ.

This sounds good! But how can we make it practical?

No one could read the whole Bible in one sitting. It’s pretty hard to even read individual books like Genesis or Isaiah in one go. A regular, disciplined approach is the way forward. And my hope is that the Bible Summary tweets can help you with that.

Why not follow @biblegateway and commit to reading a chapter each day when you see the summary? Even the longest chapters take less than five minutes.

Or why not use the summaries to help you with your own schedule? You can see them all at the Bible Summary website. It takes less than five minutes to get an overview of a book that way.

However you engage with Scripture, you can also use the Bible Summary archive to help you find specific passages or give wider context to your reading.

But why not take this opportunity to get started with the whole Bible? The big picture will increase your understanding of Scripture, and also grow your faith in the God who inspired it.

Chris Juby is director of worship at King’s Church in Durham, England, where he lives with his wife and two young sons. For three-and-a-half years between 2010 and 2013 he summarized a chapter of the Bible each day on Twitter. You can find out more at the Bible Summary website.

NASB and Two Spanish Bibles Added to our Verse of the Day

Although we mentioned this along with some of our other New Year announcements, it seems worth calling special attention to three recent additions to our Verse of the Day—two of them Spanish! Our daily Verse of the Day email is now available in three new Bible translations (click on each Bible’s name for more information about it):

New American Standard Bible: A literal, uncompromising Bible translation that builds on the older American Standard Version, but which renders the text’s grammar and terminology in contemporary English.

La Biblia de las Américas: A fresh translation of the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Bible texts into modern Spanish, following the same principles for translation set by the English NASB (above). An accurate, highly readable contemporary Spanish Bible.

Reina-Valera 1977: The 1977 edition of the Reina-Valera Bible, one of the oldest Spanish Bible translations. This Bible is read and loved by Spanish speakers throughout the world today.

You can sign up for the Verse of the Day in any (or all) of these Bibles by visiting our Newsletters page; check the Verse of the Day box on the right and choose your desired Bible version(s) from the drop-down menus below it. (If you already subscribe to our Verse of the Day email, this will update your Bible preferences accordingly.)

The Verse of the Day email is one of our most popular resources, and we’re pleased to add these three Bibles to it. Thanks to all of you who have patiently requested these Bibles in the past, and special thanks to the Bible publishers (The Lockman Foundation and Editorial CLIE) who’ve made them available both on Bible Gateway and as part of our Verse of the Day!